CrossRef enabled

PAC Archives

Archive →

Pure Appl. Chem., 2012, Vol. 84, No. 9, pp. 1939-1971

http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/PAC-REP-11-10-04

Published online 2012-07-09

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY DIVISION

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY DIVISION

IUPAC/CITAC Guide: Investigating out‑of‑specification test results of chemical composition based on metrological concepts (IUPAC Technical Report)

Ilya Kuselman1*, Francesca Pennecchi2, Cathy Burns3, Aleš Fajgelj4 and Paolo de Zorzi5

1 National Physical Laboratory of Israel, Givat Ram, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel
2 Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, 91 Strada delle Cacce, 10135 Turin, Italy
3 Food and Drug Administration, 6th Avenue and Kipling Street, DFC-Bldg 20, Denver, CO 80225, USA
4 International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
5 Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Via Castel Romano, 100 – 00128, Roma, Italy

Abstract: A metrological background for investigating out-of-specification (OOS) test results of chemical composition is discussed. When an OOS test result is identified, it is important to determine its root causes and to avoid reoccurrence of such results. An investigation of the causes based on metrological concepts is proposed. It includes assessment of validation data of the measurement process and its metrological traceability chains, evaluation of measurement uncertainty, and related producer’s and consumer’s risks. This approach allows distinguishing between OOS test results that indicate an actual change in chemical composition of an analyzed object, and OOS test results that are metrologically related with a certain confidence probability, i.e., caused by measurement problems, while the analyzed object still meets the specification requirements at the time of testing. Practical examples illustrating applications of the described approach in environ-mental and food analysis, as well in drug analysis and stability study of drug products, are described. Acceptance limits, warning and action lines for the test results, and corresponding producer’s and consumer’s risks are discussed.